Kalit so‘zlar
Abstrakt
Ушбу мақола рақамли асрда инсон ҳуқуқлари тамойилларини қўллаб-қувватлашнинг долзарб муаммосини ўрганиб чиқди. Мақолада технологияга кириш, махфийлик ва маълумотларни бошқариш, онлайн сўз еркинлиги, чекка гуруҳларни ҳимоя қилиш, пайдо бўлаётган технологик таҳдидлар ҳамда кибермакон ва маълумотларга асосланган жамият контекстида ҳуқуқларни таъминлашга қаратилган маҳаллийдан глобал даражагача бўлган ҳуқуқий масалалар таҳлил қилинди. Биринчидан, мавжуд инсон ҳуқуқлари рақамли муҳитда доимий долзарблигини сақлаб қолиши, лекин ривожланаётган бошқарув орқали янги контекстларга қайта ўтиши асослантирилди. Иккинчидан, технологиялар келтириб чиқарадиган кўп қиррали имкониятлар ва хавф-хатарлар зарарни юмшатиш билан бирга ваколатларни максимал даражада оширишга қаратилган далилларга асосланган сиёсат исботланди. Учинчидан, ҳуқуқларга асосланган рақамли фючерслар ва назорат билан кўп манфаатдор томонларнинг ҳамкорлигини мувозанатлаш тажрибаси ўрганилди.
Библиографические ссылки
Access Now. (2018). Human rights in the age of artificial intelligence. // URL: https://www.accessnow.org/cms/assets/uploads/2018/11/AI-and-Human-Rights.pdf.
Amnesty International. (2018). Toronto declaration: Protecting the rights to equality and non-discrimination in machine learning systems. // URL: https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/pol30/1404/2018/en/.
Article 19. (2019). The social media councils: Consultation, transparency and oversight. // URL: https://www.article19.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/A19-SMC-Consultation-paper-2019-v05.pdf.
Barlow, J. P. (1996). A declaration of the independence of cyberspace. // URL: https://www.eff.org/cyberspace-independence.
Yusupov, Sardor. "Legalization of Artificial Intelligence: Significance and Necessity." Miasto Przyszłości 26 (2022): 48-50. // URL: http://miastoprzyszlosci.com.pl/index.php/mp/article/view/417
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. (2018). Artificial intelligence and human rights. // URL: https://carnegieendowment.org/files/AI_WhitePaper_full.pdf.
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. (2019). Shifting tactics: Civil society strategies to influence digital policy. // URL: https://carnegieendowment.org/files/Carnegie_Digital_Paper_FINAL.pdf.
Gulyamov, Said, and Mokhinur Bakhramova. "Digitalization of international arbitration and dispute resolution by artificial intelligence." World Bulletin of Management and Law 9 (2022): 79-85. https://www.scholarexpress.net/index.php/wbml/article/view/848
Caron, C. (2018). Legally protecting privacy on the Internet in an international context. Canadian International Lawyer, 15(1), 58-78.
Cashmore, A., & Rojek, C. (Eds.). (2019). The Routledge handbook of cybersecurity. Routledge.
Yusupov, S. (2022). Psychological Issues in Robotic systems and Advanced Computer Legal Regulation. Journal of Intellectual Property and Human Rights, 1(8), 17–22. Retrieved from // URL: http://journals.academiczone.net/index.php/jiphr/article/view/198.
Cath, C., Wachter, S., Mittelstadt, B., Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L. (2018). Artificial intelligence and the 'good society': The US, EU, and UK approach. Science and Engineering Ethics, 24(2), 505-528.
Choudary, S. P. (2022). The blockchain bill of rights: We need new rules for the decentralized age. MIT Press.
Clark, N., & Landau, S. (2021). Theshotgun marriage: Cooperation and competition in global digital governance. Columbia Global Reports.
Council of Europe. (n.d.). Development of digital rights. // URL: https://rm.coe.int/prems-055521-gbr-2018-developments-digital-rights-web-16x24/1680a0c77e.
Council of Europe. (2014). Recommendation CM/Rec (2014)6 of the Committee of Ministers to member States on a Guide to human rights for Internet users. https://search.coe.int/cm/Pages/result_details.aspx?ObjectId=09000016804d5b31.