Kalit so‘zlar
Как цитировать
Abstrakt
Raqamli texnologiyalardan foydalanishning jadal rivojlanishi raqamli ma’lumotlar va dalillarga kirishni ancha osonlashtirdi. Bu ma’lumotlar va raqamli dalillar Internet, ijtimoiy tarmoqlar yoki sun’iy yo‘ldoshlar orqali qo‘lga kiritiladi. Ular inson huquqlari va xalqaro jinoyat huquqi buzilishlarini tergov qilishda qo‘llanilishi mumkin. Shu bois, inson huquqlari va xalqaro jinoyat huquqi buzilishlarini tergov qilishda shaxsiy hayot daxlsizligi huquqi bilan axborot va raqamli dalillardan foydalanish o‘rtasidagi muvozanatni qayta ko‘rib chiqish muammosi paydo bo‘lmoqda. Maqolada inson huquqlari buzilishlarini hujjatlashtirish va xalqaro jinoyatlarni sud qilishda raqamli dalillarning o‘zgarib borayotgan roli ko’rib chiqilgan. Unda xalqaro sudlar va inson huquqlari mexanizmlariga alohida e’tibor qaratilgan holda, huquqiy asoslar, maqbullik mezonlari, uslubiy muammolar hamda axloqiy masalalar chuqur tahlil etiladi. Xalqaro va milliy odil sudlovni hamda jinoiy javobgarlikni ta’minlash, shuningdek, inson huquqlari va xalqaro jinoyat huquqining barcha buzilishlarini hujjatlashtirish maqsadida tahliliy yondashuv qo‘llaniladi. Bu yondashuv inson huquqlari va xalqaro jinoyat huquqi buzilishlarini tergov qilishda raqamli ma’lumotlar va dalillardan foydalanish bo‘yicha oldingi tadqiqotlarni tahlil qilish orqali amalga oshiriladi.
Библиографические ссылки
Jan Gruber, Christopher J. Hargreaves, and Felix C. Freiling, “Contamination of Digital Evidence: Understanding an Underexposed Risk”, Forensic Science International: Digital Investigation, 44 (2023), 1-10 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsidi.2023.30150)
Graeme Horsman, “Digital Evidence Strategies for Digital Forensic Science Examinations”, Science & Justice, 63.1 (2023), 116–126 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2022.11.004
Karolina Aksamitowska, “Digital Evidence in Domestic Core International Crimes Prosecutions: Lessons Learned from Germany, Sweden, Finland and The Netherlands”, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 19.1 (2021), 189–211 https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqab035
Ivan Prysiazhniuk, “Use of digital evidence in criminal process: some issues of right to privacy protection”, Visegrad Journal on Human Rights, 5 (2023), 81-88 https://doi.org/10.61345/1339- 7915.2023.5.11
Karolina Aksamitowska, “Digital Evidence in Domestic Core International Crimes Prosecutions: Lessons Learned from Germany, Sweden, Finland and The Netherlands”, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 19.1 (2021), 189–211 https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqab035
Widya Setiabudi Sumadinata, “CYBERCRIME and GLOBAL SECURITY THREATS: A CHALLENGE in INTERNATIONAL LAW”, Russian Law Journal, 11.3 (2023), 438-444 https://doi.org/10.52783/rlj.v11i3.1112
A/HRC/52/62, Report of the Independent International Commission of Inquiry on Ukraine. Advance Unedited Version. Human Rights Council. Fifty-second session. 27 February–31 March 2023. Agenda item 4. Human rights situations that require the Council’s attention. 15 March 2023. https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/documents/hrbodies/hrcouncil/coiukraine/A_HRC_52_62 _AUV_EN.pdf
Max Tani, Satellite companies are restricting Gaza images. Updated Nov 6, 2023, 5:05am GMT+3. https://www.semafor.com/article/11/05/2023/satellite-companies-are-restricting-gaza-images
María De Arcos Tejerizo, “Digital Evidence and Fair Trial Rights at the International Criminal Court”, Leiden Journal of International Law, 36.3 (2023), 749–69 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156523000031
A/HRC/42/CRP.3, Full report: the economic interests of the Myanmar military https://www.ohchr.org/en/hr-bodies/hrc/myanmar-ffm/economic-interests-myanmar-military
Prosecutor v. Ahmad Al Faqi Al Mahdi at the International Criminal Court https://www.icccpi.int/sites/default/files/CaseInformationSheets/Al-MahdiEng.pdf
Zhilong Guo, Jie Hao, and Lewis Kennedy, “Protection path of personal data and privacy in China: Moving from monism to dualism in civil law and then in criminal law”, Computer Law & Security Review, 52 (2024), 105928 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2023.105928
Ilyoung Hong, Hyeon Yu, Sangjin Lee, and Kyungho Lee, “A New Triage Model Conforming to the Needs of Selective Search and Seizure of Electronic Evidence”, Digital Investigation, 10.2 (2013), 175–92 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diin.2013.01.003