Keywords
How to Cite
Abstract
This article is devoted to the legal analysis of the status of artificial intelligence (AI) systems in civil legal relations. In the context of the modern digital economy and technological progress, the active involvement of AI systems in civil transactions requires a clear determination of their legal nature, which underlies the relevance of this study. The purpose of the article is to provide a theoretical and practical analysis of the place of AI systems in civil legal relations as an object of law. As a result of the study, it is substantiated that AI systems do not possess independent rights and obligations as a subject of law, but should instead be regarded as a special type of object regulated by the norms of civil law. The author analyzes the specific characteristics of AI systems as an object of civil transactions (degree of autonomy, the question of legal ownership, and allocation of liability) and reveals their distinctions from traditional objects (property, things, and property rights). The scientific novelty of the article lies in proposing a unified system of criteria for classifying AI systems as an object of civil law. The practical significance of the research consists in the possibility of using its findings to improve the civil legislation of the Republic of Uzbekistan, in particular in developing proposals for incorporating norms defining the legal status of AI systems into the Civil Code. The article may also be applied in legal education and scientific research activities.
References
The EU Artificial Intelligence Act. https://www.euaiact.com/web_page_name
Executive Order 14365 of December 11, 2025, “Ensuring a National Policy Framework for Artificial Intelligence” // The White House, Presidential Actions, 11.12.2025. https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/12/eliminating-state-law-obstruction-of-national-artificial-intelligence-policy/
Gesetz zur Durchführung der Verordnung über künstliche Intelligenz (KI-Marktüberwachungs- und Innovationsförderungsgesetz — KI-MIG), vom Deutschen Bundestag am 11. Juni 2026 beschlossen (Bundestag-Drucksache 21/4594, in der vom Digitalausschuss geänderten Fassung 21/6407), vom Bundesrat am 10. Juli 2026 gebilligt. https://www.bundestag.de/dokumente/textarchiv/2026/kw24-de-ki-1183820; https://www.bundesregierung.de/breg-de/aktuelles/umsetzung-ki-verordnung-2406638
人工知能関連技術の研究開発及び活用の推進に関する法律 (Act on the Promotion of Research, Development and Utilization of Artificial Intelligence-Related Technologies). https://www8.cao.go.jp/cstp/ai/ai_act/ai_act.html
生成式人工智能服务管理暂行办法 (Interim Measures for the Management of Generative AI Services). http://www.cac.gov.cn/2023-07/13/c_1690898327029107.htm
Pagallo U. The Laws of Robots: Crimes, Contracts, and Torts. Dordrecht: Springer, 2013. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-94-007-6564-1
Filipova I.A., Koroteev V.D. Future of the Artificial Intelligence: Object of Law or Legal Personality? // Journal of Digital Technologies and Law. — 2023. — Vol. 1, No. 2. — P. 359–386. — DOI: 10.21202/jdtl.2023.15. https://doi.org/10.21202/jdtl.2023.15
J.Sharipov, R.Nuridinov. Сунъий интеллект: таълим сифатини ошириш драйвери. 07.05.2025. Taraqqiyot strategiyasi markazi rasmiy web-sayti. // https://strategy.uz/index.php?news=2096
I.B.Zokirov. Fuqarolik huquqi: Darslik. I qism.; Qayta ishlangan va to‘ldirilgan beshinchi nashr. –T.: TDYUI nashriyoti, 2009.// https://unilibrary.uz/literature/145352
H.Rahmonqulov. Fuqarolik huquqi obyektlari (o‘quv qo‘llanma). –T.: TDYUI nashriyoti, 2009.// https://library.tsul.uz/uz/books/23492
O.Oqyulov, J.I.Yuldashev, N.F.Imomov. Fuqarolik huquqiga kirish: Darslik. Toshkent-2025 // https://library.tsul.uz/uz/books/4834
O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Fuqarolik kodeksiga sharh. 1-jild (birinchi qism) Adliya vazirligi. – T.: «Vektor-Press», 2010. – 816 b. // https://library.tsul.uz/uz/books/5269
X.R.Isanov Sun’iy intellekt tizimlari oshiqcha xavf manbayi sifatida: fors-major holati // Yurisprudensiya. – 2025. – 5-jild, 1-son. – B. 32–33. DOI: 10.51788/tsul.jurisprudence.5.1./VINX6590 // https://yurisprudensiya.tsul.uz/index.php/yurisprudensiya/article/view/90
Архипов, В. В., Наумов, В. Б. (2017). О некоторых вопросах теоретических оснований развития законодательства о робототехнике: аспекты воли и правосубъектности. Закон, 5, 157–170. https://zakon.ru/LibraryHome/Publication?_igZakon=True&_pubId=11526
Fuqarolik huquqi: Darslik. I qism. I.B.Zokirov; Mas’ul muharrir: H.Rahmonqulov: Qayta ishlangan va to‘ldirilgan beshinchi nashr. –T.: TDYUI nashriyoti, 2009.// Fuqarolik huquqi: Darslik. I qism. Mualliflar jamoasi. O‘zbekiston Respublikasida xizmat ko'rsatgan yurist, prof. O.Oqyulovning umumiy taliriri ostida. - Т.: TDYU nashriyoti. 2017.// Fuqarolik huquqiga kirish. Darslik. Oqyulov O., Yuldashev J.I., Imomov N.F., Yuridik adabiyotlar publish. Toshkent. https://unilibrary.uz/literature/145352
Raxmonov, T. (2025). Oʻzbekistonda sun’iy intellektning fuqarolik-huquqiy maqomini aniqlash masalalari. Ijtimoiy-gumanitar fanlarning dolzarb muammolari Актуальные проблемы социально-гуманитарных наук Actual Problems of Humanities and Social Sciences., 5(S/9), 449–454. https://doi.org/10.47390/SPR1342V5SI9Y2025N72
Abbott, Ryan. The Reasonable Robot: Artificial Intelligence and the Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020.// https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3611370&__cf_chl_f_tk=tb.O21MM9oZ1m8fWyWxOGkjQyACQdTQQ7c4MRjK68wQ-1783417660-1.0.1.1-YWxNJ.ODxSmAFELzo5muVuNGLbWUxAMECvPCZhFPHqE
Bryson, Joanna J. “Robots Should Be Slaves.” In Close Engagements with Artificial Companions: Key Social, Psychological, Ethical and Design Issues, ed. Yorick Wilks, 63–74. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2010. DOI:10.1075/nlp.8.11bry// https://researchportal.bath.ac.uk/en/publications/robots-should-be-slaves
Calo, Ryan. “The Interesting Robot: A Reply to Professor Abbott.” Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies 25, no. 1 (2022): 1–15. Oxford University Press.//https://www.researchgate.net/publication/363114569_The_Interesting_Robot_A_Reply_to_Professor_Abbott
S.Bozarov. Sun’iy intellekt javobgarligining axloqiy va huquqiy taomillari // Общество и инновации. 2022. Т. 3. № 3. С. 48–56. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/362153091_Sun'iy_intellekt_javobgarligining_axloqiy_va_huquqiy_taomillari
Bozarov S.S. Artificial Intelligence – Whether Responsibility of Robots Possible? // Yurisprudensiya. – 2021. – №5. – B. 60–64. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/368737614_Artificial_intelligence_-_WHEther_responsibility_of_robots_possible
А.В.Убайдуллаева. Sun’iy intellekt yordamida yaratilgan intellektual mulkning huquqiy tartibga solinishi. Yuridik fanlar bo‘yicha falsafa doktori dissertatsiyasi avtoreferati. TDYU. Toshkent-2025 https://justy.uz/books/suniy-intellekt-yordamida-yaratilgan-intellektual-mulkning-huquqiy-tartibga-solinishi/
Rustambekov I., Gulyamov S., Ubaydullaeva A., Intellectual Property in the Digital Age: Educational methodical manual. Tashkent state University of law. Tashkent-2025 https://library.tsul.uz/uz/books/18507