Keywords
Abstract
The owner of digital assets considers that he has the characteristics of real property based on the fact that he can own them in the virtual space, use them, and then dispose of them with material benefits. In the current legislation of the Republic of Uzbekistan, there are gaps that need to be eliminated in the legal regulation of digital assets. In particular, it is necessary to clarify and expand the term "digital assets" in the legislation of the Republic of Uzbekistan, to introduce a new classification that divides them into virtual property (property rights) and virtual personal non-property benefits and rights related to property rights, and to make appropriate changes to their legal regulation. The fact that the concept of "digital assets" or "economic assets" has been expressed in a number of regulatory documents of foreign countries is considered a good foreign experience for us. There is no legal definition of the term "virtual property". In addition, the concepts of "digital rights (digital asset)", "digital object", "virtual property", "virtual game property" should be distinguished from each other. The use of civil law to regulate digital assets remains fragmented, even with future reforms, and even with the rapid development and integration of blockchain technology in the near future, the practice of creating, implementing and using digital financial assets based on it, digital does not take into account all the functions that financial assets can perform. In this article, the author analyzes national and international legal doctrine and experience to determine the legal status of a digital asset in the legislation of Uzbekistan, and offers suggestions for improving the national legislation.
References
1. Савицкая К. Д. Цифровые активы: теория и правовое регулирование на примере Соединенных Штатов Америки //Вестник Полоцкого государственного университета. Серия D, Экономические и юридические науки. – 2015. – С. 75-77.
2. Цифровое право : учебник / [Егорова М. А., Блажеев В. В.]; Под общ. ред. В. В. Блажеева, М. А. Егоровой. Москва : Проспект, 2020. 640 с
3. Александрова Н. С. Соотношение понятий «цифровые права», «цифровая валюта» и «цифровой финансовый актив» //Вестник Московского университета МВД России. – 2021. – №. 6. – С. 28-31.
4. Рожкова, М. А. Является ли цифровое право отраслью права и нужно ли ожидать появления Цифрового кодекса? // Хозяйство и право. 2020. № 4. С. 3‒13.
5. Савельев, А. И. Криптовалюты в системе объектов гражданских прав // Закон. 2017. № 8. С. 136‒154
6. Гаврилов, В. Н., Рафиков, Р. М. Криптовалюта как объект гражданских прав в законодательстве России и ряда зарубежных государств // ВЭПС. 2019. № 1. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/kriptovalyuta-kak-obekt-grazhdanskih-prav-v-zakonodatelstve-rossii-i-ryada-zarubezhnyh-gosudarstv; Конобеевска, И. М. Цифровые права как новый объект гражданских прав // Изв. Сарат. ун-та Нов. сер. Сер. Экономика. Управление. Право. 2019. № 3. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/tsifrovye-prava-kak-novyi-obekt-grazhdanskih-prav
7. Александрова Н. С. Соотношение понятий «цифровые права», «цифровая валюта» и «цифровой финансовый актив» //Вестник Московского университета МВД России. – 2021. – №. 6. – С. 28-31.
8. Кучеров, И. И. Законное платежное средство как категория финансового права // Журнал российского права. 2014. № 8 (212).
9. Agnessa O. Inshakova, Ludmila A. Chegovadze, Tatyana V. Deryugina. Legal realisation of information technology activities of the government-owned corporations : automation of management and control // IOP Conference Series : Materials Science and Engineering. Issue 1, 20 March 2019. Vol. 483
10. Маилян, С. С., Миронов, А. Л. Некоторые вопросы по повышению эффективности государственного управления // Вестник Московского университета МВД России. 2014. № 9. URL: https://cyberleninka.r u/ar ticle/n/nekotor ye-voprosy-po-povysheniyueffektivnosti-gosudarstvennogo-upravleniya
11. Perrone, M. What happens when we die: estate planning of digital assets / M. Perrone // CommLaw Conspectus [Electronic resource]. - 2012. - Т. 21. - Mode of access: Http://commlaw.cua.edu/res/docs/21-1/Perrone.pdf.
12. Beier, J.C. The Digital Asset Dilemma / J.C. Beier, S. Porter // NYSBA Trusts and Estates Law Section Newsletter [Electronicresource]. - 2013. - Vol. 46, - № 2. - Mode of access: http://www.mcglawyer.com/pdf_files/ TrustsandEstatesSummer2013.pdf
13. Moncur, W. Digital Inheritance / W. Moncur, A. Waller // RCUK Digital Futures [Electronic resource]. - 2010. - Mode of access: http://www.computing.dundee.ac.uk/staff/wmoncur/publications/2010-rcuk digital Futures.pdf
14. Lastowka, G. Living and Dying in a Virtual World / G. Lastowka, T. Hall [Electronic resource]. - 2013. - Mode of access: http://lastowka.rutgers.edu/files/2013/10/Lastowka.pdf
15. Sherry, K. What Happens to Our Facebook Accounts When We Die?: Probate Versus Policy and the Fate of Social-Media Assets Postmortem / K. Sherry // Pepp. L. Rev [Electronicresource]. - 2012. - Т. 40. - Mode of access: http://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1726&context=plr
16. Chambers, J. Family Gets GI's E-Mail / J. Chambers // Detroit News, Apr. 21, 2005, at 1 [Electronic re¬source]. - 2005. - Mode of access: www.justinellsworth.net/email/detnewsapr.htm
17. Darrow, J.J. Email Is Forever... Or Is It? / J.J. Darrow, G.R. Ferrera // J. Internet L. No. - 2008. - Т. 11. - С. 10, 1, 18 [Electronic resource]. - 2008. - Mode of access:http://www.digitalestateplanning.com/
18. Tracy, S. Family, lawmakers push for Facebook changes following son's suicide / S. Tracy // [Electronic resource]. - 2013. - Mode of access: http://wtvr.com
19. Kirk, D.S. On human remains: Values and practice in the home archiving of cherished objects / D.S. Kirk, A. Sellen // ACM Trans. Comput. - Hum. Interact. - № 17(3). - 2010 [Electronic resource]. - 2013. - Mode of access: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1806923.1806924.
20. Farwell, J. Death & digital data: What happens to what you leave behind? / J. F arwell // Computers & Electronics. - 2007. - № 18(9). - Р. 33-35
21. Blazer, C. The Five Indicia of Virtual Property (discussing the “five indicia” for determining what is a legally protectable digital asset) / C. Blazer [Electronic resource]. - 2006. - Mode of access: http://law.unh.edu/ assets/images/uploads/publications/pierce-law-review-vol05-no1-blazer_1.pdf.
22. Blazer, C. The Five Indicia of Virtual Property (discussing the “five indicia” for determining what is a legally protectable digital asset) / C. Blazer [Electronic resource]. - 2006. - Mode of access: http://law.unh.edu/ assets/images/uploads/publications/pierce-law-review-vol05-no1-blazer_1.pdf.
23. Dosch, N. Over View of Digital Assets: Defining Digital Assets for the Legal Community / N. Dosch [Electronic resource]. - 2010. - Mode of access: http://www.digitalestateplanning.com/.
24. Conner, J. Digital Life After Death: The Issue of Planning for a Person's Digital Assets After Death / J. Conner // Est. Plan. &Cmty. Prop. LJ. - 2010. - Т. 3 [Electronic resource]. - 2010. - Mode of access: http://heinonline.org/ HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/epcplj3&div=18&id=&page=.
25. Dosch, N. Over View of Digital Assets: Defining Digital Assets for the Legal Community / N. Dosch [Electronic resource]. - 2010. - Mode of access: http://www.digitalestateplanning.com/.
26. Act concerning access to decedents' electronic mail accounts: Senate Bill № 262 Public Act, June 24, 2005 № 05-136 [Electronic resource]. - 2005. - Mode of access: http://www.cga.ct.gov/2005/act/Pa/2005PA-00136- R00SB-00262-PA.htm. §§ 64.2-109; 110 Code of Virginia, July 1, 2013 // Legislative Information System [Electronic resource]. - 2013. - Mode of access: https://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe
27. Resolve, to Study the Issue of Inheritance of Digital Assets House of Representatives: Legislative Document № 850 (HP 601), March 5, 2013 // State of Maine Legislature [Electronic resource]. - 2013. - Mode of access: http: //www.mainelegislature.org/legis/bills/getPDF.asp?paper=HP0601&item=1&snum=126.
28. Relating to digital property: Senate Bill, January 14, 2013, № 54 // Oregon State Legislature [Electronic resource]. - 2012. - Mode of access: https://olis.leg.state.or.us/liz/2013R1/Downloads/MeasureDocument/ SB54/ Introduced
29. Relating to digital property: Senate Bill, January 14, 2013, № 54 // Oregon State Legislature [Electronic resource]. - 2012. - Mode of access: https://olis.leg.state.or.us/liz/2013R1/Downloads/MeasureDocument/ SB54/ Introduced
30. Relating to digital property: Senate Bill, January 14, 2013, № 54 // Oregon State Legislature [Electronic resource]. - 2012. - Mode of access: https://olis.leg.state.or.us/liz/2013R1/Downloads/MeasureDocument/ SB54/ Introduced
31. Dosch, N. Over View of Digital Assets: Defining Digital Assets for the Legal Community / N. Dosch [Electronic resource]. - 2010. - Mode of access: http://www.digitalestateplanning.com/
32. Классификация // Энциклопедический словарь Брокгауза и Ефрона. - СПб., 18901907. - Т. 82. - 1058 с.
33. Tracy, S. Family, lawmakers push for Facebook changes following son's suicide / S. Tracy // [Electronic resource]. - 2013. - Mode of access: http://wtvr.com.
34. Cahn, N. Postmortem Life On-line / Cahn, N. // Probate & Property [Electronic resource]. - 2011. - Т. 25, № 4. - Mode of access: http://scholarship.law.gwu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi.