Abstract
This scientific article examines the genesis of the principle of autonomy of will and reveals its essence as a philosophical doctrine. It provides a critical analysis of how this principle is embodied in the current Civil Code and discloses its substantive content. The essence of the self-regulation mechanism and the conditions for its application are studied in close connection with the conditions for the exercise of autonomy of will. It is noted that issues related to the application of self-restraint in the exercise of rights have both historical roots and modern legal constructions; in particular, they are associated with problems arising from fraudsters obtaining online loans in the name of other persons. The necessity of anonymous participation of subjects in civil turnover is also examined. In the final scientific conclusion, the expediency of interpreting autonomy of will in the Civil Code as a system of principles identified in this study is substantiated. At the same time, the article advances the idea that, under conditions of legal pluralism, alongside the national legislative segment, the functioning of constructions of Anglo-Saxon law and Islamic finance is permitted within the legal space of our country, which in practice contributes to the structural enrichment of the interpretation of the principle of autonomy of will.
Certainly, the significance of the autonomy of will should not be absolutized as the highest manifestation of human freedom. Freedom is always associated with conscious necessity, which in no way can be harmonized with arbitrariness or anarchy. Therefore, while recognizing the autonomy of will as one of the fundamental principles of civil law, one should not forget the limits of its application.
References
Кант И. Основа положения метафизики нравов. Собрание сочинение Том IV Москва. 1994. 219 б.
Риль А. Введение в современной философии. / Энциклопедические библиотеки для самообразование. С. Петербург. 1904. 18 б.
Камю А. Бунтующий человек. Москва. 1990. 189 б.
Аванесов С.С. Автономное воле: Кант и Шопенгауэр о бесценности нравственного действие. https://share.google/Mhirl9gpm9vo8L6NN
Бахтин М.М. К философии поступкам. / Философия и социология. Наука и техника. Ежегодник. Москва. 1986. 86 б.
Аронсон Д.О. Свобода и принуждение. Кантовские обоснование понятие право. Москва. 2014. 8 б.
Raqobat muhitini yanada rivojlantirish va iqtisodiyotdagi davlat ishtirokini qisqartirish bo‘yicha qo‘shimcha chora-tadbirlar to‘g‘risida https://lex.uz/docs/4887654.
Davlat huquqiy siyosatini amalga oshirishda adliya organlari va muassasalari faoliyatini yanada takomillashtirish chora-tadbirlari to‘g‘risida https://lex.uz/docs/4820060.
O‘zbekiston Respublikasining Qonuni “Jismoniy tarbiya va sport to‘g‘risida”gi o‘zbekiston Respublikasi qonuniga o‘zgartish va qo‘shimchalar kiritish haqida // https://lex.uz/docs/2742233
Loboda A.I. Avtonomiya voli, yee predelы v sovremennom MChP, unifikasiya v MChP. Leksiya. https://share.google/fdx9OZ6rE0khXlZdz
O‘zbekiston Respublikasida yuridik ta’lim va ilm-fanni yanada isloh qilish chora-tadbirlari to‘g‘risida O‘zbekiston Respublikasi PrezidentiningFarmoni https://lex.uz/docs/7864099
Islomiy moliya real bozordan ajralmagan iqtisodiyot. Kun.uz. 22:06/10.10.2025.8249 https://kun.uz/news/2025/10/10/islomiy-moliya-real-bozordan-ajralmagan-iqtisodiyot.
Bankirs.uz 09.01.2026 yil15:42.126
О.Окюлов. Правовое пространства Узбекистана. // Правда Востока, 22 августа 2024 года.