Vol. 2 No. 3 (2021), ARTICLES
Vol. 2 No. 3 (2021)

INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCE OF PREVENTING POSSIBLE CAUSING TO THE CONSUMER THROUGH CONTRACTS CONCLUDED ON THE INTERNET

ARTICLES
Published 2021-07-07
Jakhongir BABAEV
Acting Professor at the Department of Civil Law of Tashkent State University of Law, Candidate of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor // E-mail: jahongirbabaev76@mail.ru
PDF (O'zbek)

Keywords

internet, international law, convention, commercial, consumer, damage, liability, contract, agreement, parties.

Abstract

This article analyzes the problems of identification and protection of rights in the sale of goods and services to consumers via the Internet, complicated by a foreign element, and provides some feedback on their solutions. The author analyzes the scientific and theoretical aspects of determining whether online trade or service is different from trade and service in traditional retail outlets and consumer services, and the right to compensation for damage caused to consumers as a result of breach of contract. In particular, it analyzes civil legal relations, ranging from the daily exchange of information to the conclusion and conclusion of contracts for the establishment and implementation of trade and service relations, the formation and operation of e-commerce, which is very convenient for the consumer. Goods and services sold to the consumer via the Internet the issues of which state court the consumer should apply to in order to protect their rights in case of poor quality and defective services were analyzed and considered in detail. On the basis of these analyzes, scientific and theoretical conclusions have been drawn on the improvement of national legislation.

PDF (O'zbek)

References

1. Benno J. Consumer Purchases through Telecommunications in

Europe – Application of Private International Law to Cross-Border Contractual Disputes. Oslo. 1993. P.81.

2. Case C-464/01 // European Court Reports. 2005. I-00439.

3. Debussere F. International Jurisdiction over E-Consumer Contracts in the European Contracts in the Eu¬ropean Union: Quid Novi Sub Sole? // International Journal of Law and Information Technology. 2002. Vol. 10. – №3. P.358.

4. European Commission, Justice and Home Affairs DG Statement on Articles 15 and 73 // URL: http:// ec.europa.eu/civiljustice/homepage/homepage_ec_en_declaration.pdf (дата обращения: 30.08.2015).

5. Foss M., Bygrave L.A. International Consumer Purchases through the Internet: Jurisdictional Issues pursuant to European Law // International Journal of Law and Information Technology. 2000. Vol. 8. P.108.

6. Gillies L.E. Addressing the “Cyberspace Fallacy”: Targeting the Jurisdiction of an Electronic Consumer Contract // International Journal of Law and Information Technology. 2008. Vol. 16. – №3. P.268.

7. Howells G., Reich N. The Current Limits of European Harmonization in Consumer Contract Law // ERAForum. 2011. – №12. P.41.

8. Jacquemyns L.R., Verbiest T. L’offre de services et produits financiers sur internet // RDAI. 2000. – №1. Р.27.

9. Lubitz M. Jurisdiction and Choice of Law for Electronic Contracts: an English Perspective // Computer und Recht. 2001. – №39. P.41.

10. Øren J.S.T. International Jurisdiction Over Consumer Contracts in

E-Europe // The International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 2003. – №52. P.675.

11. Powell M.D., Turner-Kerr P.M. Issues in e-commerce – European Union: Putting the e- in Brussels and Rome // Computer Law & Security Report. 2000. – №23. Р.24.

12. Stone P. Internet Consumer Contracts and European Private International Law // Information & Communication Technology Law. 2000. – №6. Р.8.

13. Svantensson D. What Should Article 7 — Consumer Contracts, of the Proposed Hague Convention, Aim to Accomplish in Relation to E-Commerce? // Computer Law & Security Report. 2001. Vol. 17. – №5. P.323.

14. Vartanian T.P. Whose Internet is it Anyway? The Law of Jurisdiction in Cyberspace: Achieving Legal Order Among the World’s Nations. 2000 Global Internet Summit, 13–14 March 2000 // URL:http://www.kentlaw. edu/cyberlaw/resources/globalsummit.rtf (дата обращения: 30.08.2015).

15. Wild C., Weinstein S., Riefa C. Council Regulation (EC) 44/2001 and Internet Consumer Contracts: Some Thoughts on Article 15 and the Futility of Applying ‘in the box’ Conflict of Law Rules to the ‘out of box’ Border¬less World // International Review of Law, Computers & Technology. 2005. Vol. 19. – №1. P.16.

16. Резник Р.С. Международная подсудность споров из договоров с участием потребителя // Право. Журнал Высшей школы экономики. 2015.

– №4. – С. 165-173.

17. Савельев А.И. Электронная коммерция в России и за рубежом: правовое регулирование. – М., 2014.

18. Современное международное частное право в России и Евросоюзе. Кн. 1: монография / под ред. М.М.Богуславского, А.Г.Лисицына-Светланова, А.Трунка. –М., Норма, 2013. – Б. 293.

19. Weitzenböck E.M. Determining Applicable Law and Jurisdiction in contractual disputes regarding virtual enterprises. July 2002.

20. Рустамбеков И.Р. Интернет тармоғидаги фуқаролик-ҳуқуқий муносабатларни тартибга солиш: Юрид. фан. докт. дис. ...автореф.

– Тошкент: 2017.