Vol. 3 No. 1 (2023), ARTICLES
Vol. 3 No. 1 (2023)

PROBLEMS OF COLLECTIVE COPYRIGHT MANAGEMENT RELATED TO ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE: EXPERIENCE OF FOREIGN COUNTRIES

ARTICLES
Published 2023-03-13
Iroda YAKUBOVA
Associate Professor Department «Intellectual property law» of Tashkent State University of Law, Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) in Law // E-mail: i.yakubova@tsul.uz
PDF (O'zbek)

Keywords

copyright, artificial intelligence, to enforce copyright, royalty, copyright and related rights collective management, public performance or display of a work, objects of copyright and related rights, extended collective management.

Abstract

As the msin object of the topic, opinions are expressed about the artificial intelligence system, which performs logical and creative functions. Artificial intelligence is very relevant in today's information age, with the help of which humanity is opening new opportunities in science and finding solutions to global problems of the 21st century. It also increases the ability to provide quality services in medicine, education, energy, agriculture, urban development and all other fields. The problems of artificial intelligence being objects of collective management of copyrights are analyzed based on the experience of foreign countries. In addition, the article focuses on some current problems related to the improvement of this institution, international standards of copyright protection and comparative legal analysis of national legislation, as well as the opinions of scientists from Uzbekistan and other countries. Proposals and recommendations of scientific and practical importance for the development of copyright were put forward.

PDF (O'zbek)

References

1. Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach (Pearson Series in Artifical Intelligence) 4th Edition // URL: https://aima.cs.berkeley.edu/.

2. Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices, 306 - The Human Authorship Requirement, Chapter 300, accessible at < // URL:https://www.copyright.gov/comp3/docs/compendium.pdf>.

3. Cf. Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. Sarony, 111 U.S. 53 (1884).

4. Legal protection for all photographs was eventually made a part of the U.S. Copyright Act. 17 U.S.C. § 106A (2012).

5. Computer Software Copyright Act, Pub. L. No. 96-517, § 117, 94 Stat. 3028 (1980) (codified at 17 U.S.C. § 117 (1988)).

6. O‘zbekiston Respublikasining «Mualliflik huquqi va turdosh huquqlar to‘g‘risida»gi Qonuni // URL: https://lex.uz/ru/docs/-1022944.

7. World Intellectual Property Indicators, WIPO, (2019), <https://www.wipo.int/publications/en/detsils.jsp?id=4464>, accessed on 26 January 2021 at IST 0830 hrs.

8. Feist Publications v. Rural Telephone Service Company, Inc., 499 U.S. 340 (1991).

9. AN ACT TO AMEND AND CONSOLIDATE THE ACTS RESPECTING COPYRIGHT // URL: https://www.copyright.gov/history/1909act.pdf.

10. Yakubov O. Significance and Principles of the Trips Agreement in the Legal System of World Trade Organization Agreements // The Peerian Journal. – 2022. – Т. 9.

11. Зятицкий С. Проблемы реализации авторских и смежных прав на коллективной основе в условиях развития новых технологий: автореферат дис. ... кандидата юридических наук: 12.00.03. 2003.

12. Гаврилов Э.П. Право интеллектуальной собственности. АВТОРСКОЕ ПРАВО И СМЕЖНЫЕ ПРАВА. XXI век. Т.2. 2016. 880 с. ISBN 978-5-905999-85-7.

13. Гаврилов Э.П. "Право интеллектуалъной собственности. Авторское право и смежние права. ХХI век" – Yurservitum, 2016, pp. 425-446.

14. Oybek Yakubov. (2022). Significance And Principles Of The Trips Agreement In The Legal System Of World Trade Organization Agreements. The Peerian Journal, 9, 65–69. Retrieved from https://peerianjournal.com/index.php/tpj/article/view/299

15. Насриев И. И. Муаллифнинг шахсий ҳуқуқларини ҳимоялаш. Тошкент, Меҳнат, 2003.

16. Yakubova I.B. O‘zbekistonda mualliflik huquqi bo‘yicha mulkiy huquqlarni jamoaviy boshqaruv tashkilotlarining vujudga kelishi va rivojlanishi. Yurisprudensiya – Jurisprudence, 2021. No. 6. pp. 66-74.

17. Leanovich Е. B. Problems of legal regulation of the Internet relations with a foreign element. [Электронный ресурс]. http: // www.evolution.info.

18. Якубова, И. 2022. Проблемы осуществления коллективного управления авторским правом в цифровой среде: сравнительный анализ. Общество и инновации. 3, 5 (окт. 2022), 82–92. DOI:https://doi.org/10.47689/2181-1415-vol3-iss5- pp82-92.

19. И.Якубова. Понимание коллективного управления авторских прав в историческом контексте. Юрист Ахборотномаси 1 (6), 76-80.

20. Stanieri A., Zeleznikow J., Gawler M. and Lewis B, 1999 [A hybrid-neutral approach to automation of legal reasoning in the discretionary domsin of family law in Australia], Artificial intelligence and law, 7(2-3), pp. 127-132.

21. Тошев Б.Н. Муаллифлик ҳуқуқи. Дарслик. -Т.: 2010.

22. Brams, S.J. and Taylor, A.D. Fsir division from cake cutting to dispute resolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1996, pp. 48-52.