Keywords
Abstract
A parody of a trademark has been studied from the standpoint of active public relations in advertising, sale and purchase and other actions in relation to a trademark. Although the parody of a trademark is not regulated by either national legislation or the legislation of foreign countries, as a rule, the principle of good faith applies in this area of legal relations. Of course, in some cases, the parody of a trademark is carried out in the form of unfair competition, in which case the rules of the law on competition and trademarks apply. Thus, when legally assessing the legality or illegality of a paurodia for a trademark, attention should be paid to the status of the trademark owner.
References
1.15 U.S. Code § 1125, Section (c) Dulition by blurring; dilution by tarnishment, part (3) Exclusions, para (ii) URL: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/15/1125.
2.Howard Wintner. Parody Under the Trademark Laws. https://www.law.com/newyorklawjournal/2019/10/08/parody-under-the-trademark-laws/?slreturn=20220326051915#:~:text=A%20trademark%20parody%20must%20convey,parody%20from%20the%20original%20product.
3.Lila-Postkarte I ZR 159/02, 3 February 2005; BGH GRUR 2005, 583. https://dejure.org/dienste/vernetzung/
4.rechtsprechung?Gericht=BGH&Datum=03.02.2005&Aktenzeichen=I%20ZR%20159/02
5.https://wipolex.wipo.int/ru/text/126843
6.Ann Balatska. Trademark parody and Freedom of expression – Shall we dance?P.-P.29. URL:http://www.academia.edu/1487976/Trademark_parody_and_Freedom_of_expression_Shall_we_dance_paper.
7.http://www.nadiaplesner.com/simple-living--darfurnical.
8.Sarah Byrt. Lady Gaga stops Lady Goo Goo’s song – trademarks and parodies in the UK. Mayer Brown Legal Update. October 2011. P.1. URL: https://www.mayerbrown.com/files/Publication/eed723e4-061e-479c-9046-c70e56704937/Presentation/PublicationAttachment/436e7f5c-8f27-4ea2-9008-b2412740105a/11754.pdf.
9.Ate My Heart Inc v Mind Candy Ltd [2011] EWHC 2741 (Ch). https://vlex.co.uk/vid/ate-my-heart-inc-793883025
10.The Satire/Parody Distinction in Copyright and Trademark Law — Can Satire Ever Be a Fair Use? Juli Wilson Marshall, Nicholas J. Siciliano. URL: https://apps.americanbar.org/litigation/committees/intellectual/roundtables
/0506_outline.pdf.
11.Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music Inc., 510 U.S. 569 (1994), Para. 580. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/510/569/
12.M. Lemley, S. Dougan. Op. cit. – P.501. http://www.law.nyu.edu/sites/default/files/upload_documents/Menell%20-%20Rise%20of%20the%20API%20Copyright%20Dead.pdf
13.M. Lemleey. S.Dougan. Op. cit. – P.501. http://www.law.nyu.edu/sites/default/files/upload_documents/Menell%20-%20Rise%20of%20the%20API%20Copyright%20Dead.pdf
14.Barton Beebe, A Defense of the New Federal Trademark Antidilution Law, 16 FORDHAM INTELL. PROP.MEDIA & ENT. L.J. 1143, 1150-51 (2006); Desai, From Trademarks to Brands, supra note 58, at 1007-08; Heymann, The Law of Reputation, supra note 96, at 1341.
15.M. Lemley, S. Dougan. Op. cit. – P.501 - 502. http://www.law.nyu.edu/sites/default/files/upload_documents/Menell%20-%20Rise%20of%20the%20API%20Copyright%20Dead.pdf
16.M. Lemley, S. Dougan. Op. cit. – P.501 - 502. http://www.law.nyu.edu/sites/default/files/upload_documents/Menell%20-%20Rise%20of%20the%20API%20Copyright%20Dead.pdf