ТОВАР БЕЛГИСИГА ПАРОДИЯ ЁКИ КИНОЯ: ҚОНУНИЙ ЁКИ НОҚОНУНИЙ ҲИСОБЛАШ МАСАЛАСИ
PDF

Ключевые слова

Товар белгиси, пародия, киноя, Milka, Darfunica, Louis Vuitton, Lady Gaga, Priceless, Lacoste, Lada.

Аннотация

Товар белгисига нисбатан пародия товар белгисини реклама қилиш, товар маҳсулотлари олди-сотдиси жараёнлари фаол ижтимоий ҳаракат сифатида ўрганилди. Гарчи миллий ва халқаро қонунчиликда пародия қилишни тартибга солиш масаласи қонунчилик даражасида белгиланган бўлмасада, қоидага кўра ушбу фаолият инсофлилик доирасига кўра ҳал этилади. Албатта, айрим ҳолларда товар белгисига нисбатан пародия инсофсиз рақобат мазмунини ўзида акс эттиради ва бу рақобат қонунчилиги ва товар белгилари қонунчилигига мувофиқ тартибга солинади. Шунга кўра, пародияни ҳуқуқий ёки ноҳуқуқий деб баҳо беришдан олдин пародия қўлланилаётган ҳудудда товар белгиси эгасининг ижтимоий мавқеи ҳисобга олиниши лозим.

PDF

Литература

1.15 U.S. Code § 1125, Section (c) Dulition by blurring; dilution by tarnishment, part (3) Exclusions, para (ii) URL: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/15/1125.

2.Howard Wintner. Parody Under the Trademark Laws. https://www.law.com/newyorklawjournal/2019/10/08/parody-under-the-trademark-laws/?slreturn=20220326051915#:~:text=A%20trademark%20parody%20must%20convey,parody%20from%20the%20original%20product.

3.Lila-Postkarte I ZR 159/02, 3 February 2005; BGH GRUR 2005, 583. https://dejure.org/dienste/vernetzung/

4.rechtsprechung?Gericht=BGH&Datum=03.02.2005&Aktenzeichen=I%20ZR%20159/02

5.https://wipolex.wipo.int/ru/text/126843

6.Ann Balatska. Trademark parody and Freedom of expression – Shall we dance?P.-P.29. URL:http://www.academia.edu/1487976/Trademark_parody_and_Freedom_of_expression_Shall_we_dance_paper.

7.http://www.nadiaplesner.com/simple-living--darfurnical.

8.Sarah Byrt. Lady Gaga stops Lady Goo Goo’s song – trademarks and parodies in the UK. Mayer Brown Legal Update. October 2011. P.1. URL: https://www.mayerbrown.com/files/Publication/eed723e4-061e-479c-9046-c70e56704937/Presentation/PublicationAttachment/436e7f5c-8f27-4ea2-9008-b2412740105a/11754.pdf.

9.Ate My Heart Inc v Mind Candy Ltd [2011] EWHC 2741 (Ch). https://vlex.co.uk/vid/ate-my-heart-inc-793883025

10.The Satire/Parody Distinction in Copyright and Trademark Law — Can Satire Ever Be a Fair Use? Juli Wilson Marshall, Nicholas J. Siciliano. URL: https://apps.americanbar.org/litigation/committees/intellectual/roundtables

/0506_outline.pdf.

11.Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music Inc., 510 U.S. 569 (1994), Para. 580. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/510/569/

12.M. Lemley, S. Dougan. Op. cit. – P.501. http://www.law.nyu.edu/sites/default/files/upload_documents/Menell%20-%20Rise%20of%20the%20API%20Copyright%20Dead.pdf

13.M. Lemleey. S.Dougan. Op. cit. – P.501. http://www.law.nyu.edu/sites/default/files/upload_documents/Menell%20-%20Rise%20of%20the%20API%20Copyright%20Dead.pdf

14.Barton Beebe, A Defense of the New Federal Trademark Antidilution Law, 16 FORDHAM INTELL. PROP.MEDIA & ENT. L.J. 1143, 1150-51 (2006); Desai, From Trademarks to Brands, supra note 58, at 1007-08; Heymann, The Law of Reputation, supra note 96, at 1341.

15.M. Lemley, S. Dougan. Op. cit. – P.501 - 502. http://www.law.nyu.edu/sites/default/files/upload_documents/Menell%20-%20Rise%20of%20the%20API%20Copyright%20Dead.pdf

16.M. Lemley, S. Dougan. Op. cit. – P.501 - 502. http://www.law.nyu.edu/sites/default/files/upload_documents/Menell%20-%20Rise%20of%20the%20API%20Copyright%20Dead.pdf